Theorem. For , is complete.
Proof. Pick a Cauchy sequence . We can pick a subsequence such that . Set and also . By the triangle inequality on the -norm, , so by Monotone Convergence, , hence is also in , hence it converges almost everywhere to some . But clearly , so almost everywhere. You can then show using DCT that in the -norm. By the Cauchy property of , you then also show that in .
Theorem. Suppose are conjugates, and is integrable for each . Then .
Proof. We can find a sequence of simple functions which converges to in with . We may choose these such that is increasing for each . Each trivially belongs to , by simplicity. Now, let be a functional on . Linearity is obvious. Boundedness follows from Hölder’s Inequality, and in fact the extremal form thereof implies that .
Pick any . Then DCT and our assumption that implies , hence . As was arbitrary, Uniform Boundedness implies that . However, by Monotone Convergence, so .
Theorem. Suppose and let , the dual of . Then is isomorphic to , where . (We’re assuming an ambient -finite measure space here.)
Proof. D is of course already a Banach space with norm
We want to map the bounded linear functional on to some function such that
Let’s first show that implies a such that . When is the characteristic function of some measurable set , we can define a complex set function by . By linearity, is already finitely additive. On the other hand, take a countable disjoint collection and define ; assume . Finite additivity implies that for each ,
But . Boundedness of implies
Now, , and since is of finite measure (as ), . Therefore , so taking limits of establishes countable additivity of . Finally, for any -null set , , hence . So Radon-Nikodym implies that . It is not difficult to see that this, together with continuity of , implies for . Our previous theorem then implies that .
Hölder’s Inequality thus implies that , so that . Hölder’s Inequality is also sharp, so we can select to make this an equality.